Monthly Archives: December 2012

jQuery Mobile

This week, I needed a quick mobile (smart phone) proof-of-concept for one of our web app products.  Since speed of development and broad platform support were more important than native device features, I took the mobile web route.  And as a jQuery fan, I chose jQuery Mobile (JQM).

JQM emphasizes doing as much as possible with simple HTML5 and CSS.  It uses data-* custom attributes to know how to add extra behaviors, rendered and tailored as needed for the target device.  Indeed, I found I could do most things with just markup and server-side code, and very little additional JavaScript.

JQM makes AJAX calls by default, but normally expects the results to be new page divs to add to the navigation stack.  This is different from my standard web app, where $.ajax calls return only data (XML and JSON), with bits of JavaScript to update DOM components from the results.  I decided to play along and add div wrappers around results, letting JQM navigate to them as simple linked pages (href=, action=) and dialogs (data-rel=”dialog”).  The end result was cleaner code (and smoother flow than standard postbacks would be), although I did give up a bit in look and feel.

Native app development requires real devices or emulators (such as the Android Virtual Device, AVD), but with a pure mobile web app, I was able to just use Chrome with the nice Ripple extension.  This removed all delays from the code-run cycle: yet another benefit of the mobile web / HTML5 world.

I went with a standard theme and did not (yet) need the extra step of packaging for offline use or adding a native wrapper (like PhoneGap/Cordova).  But those processes appear straightforward when the time comes.  The were a few little glitches along the way, but nothing I couldn’t work around with a little JavaScript.

jQuery Mobile is perhaps the go-to framework for HTML5 mobile web apps.  Certainly for those of us who are sold on the benefits of jQuery.

New Tricks

I recently resumed working a bit on a VA Smalltalk-based system I first created over a dozen years ago. VA Smalltalk is a fantastic programming environment, but I quickly realized how much I missed automated build packaging in that world. Each build takes only a few minutes, but it’s manual, requiring clicks through a GUI and waiting for results. I wanted this to now be automated like the rest of the continuous integration free world.

Fortunately, some folks have recently built tools to help.

I started with Ernest Micklei’s Melissa tool, a handy EpPackager front-end for scripting builds.  Using it to automate builds for our headed (GUI) images was straightforward: I just created a workspace and CMD file for my particular requirements.

But scripting headless (cross-development, XD) packaging was not so simple, due to the nature of passive images and the fact that the controls are hopelessly embedded in the XD development UIs.  Eventually, I found that Thomas Koschate cracked that nut with his nice HqaAutomatedBuildSupport tools (available at  To use it, I mainly just created my own AbtBuildSpecification to specify the maps, subsystems, and features to match what I used in my XD Image Properties.

For consistency’s sake, I wrote some code to invoke AbtBuildSpecification build from MelissaBuilder. When done, I set up the CMD files as Windows Scheduled Tasks (schtasks) to run overnight.

It’s a handy process, but clearly something that could benefit from standardization by the VA Smalltalk vendor.  For example, there are different ways to script startup loads: abt.cnf, Melissa, AbtImageStartup, or some combination of these.  Perhaps our friends at Instantiations will soon include this in the base product.  Our venerable community could certainly benefit from a common way of doing these new tricks.